Feminism and right to life.

After reading Diane Grumbois's September 7th letter entitled, "Palin is no Hillery Clinton", I felt compelled to respond to the following statement she made;" True feminists believe women should control their own bodies. Sarah Palin believes we can’t be trusted."

As a Conservative, I believe I speak along with my constituency when I say, we ALL agree you women or any person for that matter should have control over your body, however, that being said where the feminists and Conservatives part ways is with the 'human being" that exists inside you. The control of a certain aspect of your body ceases to exist once another human being exists inside you, that persons rights need to be taken into consideration. Liberals, feminists alike believe in the "Natural Process" of life, especially when it comes to nature, you people are all about Organic this or that, no pesticides or mankind's influence with respect to our forests, (Biscuit fire is an example;no logging of the timber). If a child is allowed to grow full term, that baby will be born in the natural process will it not? Then your interference into that gestation is un-natural, is it not? Why do you Feminists-Liberal-Environmentalists's non-interference principals apply in nature, but do not apply in the womb?

John Wilson

Saint Helens, OR